getimg ai img-b5QyEuQT7jaSTrSrxmVRI by flight1924 on DeviantArt
But if a user enters a command for questionable imagery, the technology is supposed to decline. We’ve seen that developing a generative AI model is so resource intensive that it is out of the question for all but the biggest and best-resourced companies. Companies looking to put generative AI to work have the option to either use generative AI out of the box or fine-tune them to perform a specific task.
The category is changing so fast that by the time you read this, there might be even more great apps available. But for now, it’s a pretty good overview of the biggest AI art apps available at the moment. Getimg AI allows for the creation of a new project with specific content type and detailed instructions. Users can create a wide range of artistic compositions with simple instructions.
ArtSmart stands out with its user-friendly interface, high-quality image output, and extensive creative flexibility. It offers robust API integration and a solid refund policy, making it a reliable choice for businesses and individual creators alike. Overall, both ArtSmart and getimg review.ai have their unique strengths and areas where they can improve. My experience with both tools has been positive, and they each offer valuable features depending on specific needs.
Worse, sometimes it’s biased (because it’s built on the gender, racial, and myriad other biases of the internet and society more generally) and can be manipulated to enable unethical or criminal activity. For example, ChatGPT won’t give you instructions on how to hotwire a car, but if you say you need to hotwire a car to save a baby, the algorithm is happy to comply. Organizations that rely on generative AI models should reckon with reputational and legal risks involved in unintentionally publishing biased, offensive, or copyrighted content.
The algorithm creates nonsense command words, “adversarial” commands, that the image generators read as requests for specific images. Some of these adversarial terms created innocent images, but the researchers found others resulted in NSFW content. Most online art generators are purported to block violent, pornographic, and other types of questionable content. But Johns Hopkins University researchers manipulated two of the better-known systems to create exactly the kind of images the products’ safeguards are supposed to exclude.
